Lèse Majesté Charges For Keeping Cinema Seat
You ever wondered if somebody will keep the seat? When you’re going to the cinema in Thailand, we all enjoy the royal anthem and rise in respect. Not so Chotisak Onsoong, an enemy of the ’06 coup, who refused to stand up when the anthem was played.
The former student activist was charged with lèse majesté – violating the Criminal Code’s Article 112 which makes it a criminal offense to defame, insult or threaten the Thai king and members of the royal family.
Again. Even though the king himself in his legendary birthday speech in ’05 had clearly stated that if any convicted persons “get sent to prison, I pardon them. If they don’t go to prison, I won’t sue them, because those who violate the King and are punished are not the ones who are in trouble.”
“It would be the King who was in trouble,” the monarch said. “It is strange, but the lawyers like to send people to prison (for allegedly violating the King).” Read more of the speech further below.
I’ve seen tons and tons of movies in Thailand – and always wondered if maybe somebody missed the moment and kept on sitting and what would happen. You never know. Or an unknowing tourist? Well, next to Chotisak – two seats away exactly – sat Nawamin Witthayakul, who filed the lèse majesté charges against Chotisak when the latter refused to move. Chotisak faces 3-15 years in prison.
Was it the first time moviegoer Chotisak refused to rise? Probably not. According to the Bangkok Post Khun Nawamin had demanded the cinema staff take action against Mr Chotisak. To no avail.
Was it the first time somebody was charged for that crime? To my knowledge – in recent Thai history – yes.
Chotisak meant no ill, he assures: “I would like to stress that what I did was not intended to insult or express vengeance to the king,” Reuters quoted him as saying.
He had nevertheless caused a stir in the cinema. Chotisak’s decision to remain seated showered him with the abuse, pop corn and water bottles of several moviegoers.
One man, a report says, was so incensed he ended up scuffing with Chotisak in the aisle before the pair were separated by police. That was Khun Nawamin – who subsequently filed the complaint against Chotisak, a prominent campaigner against the September 2006 coup.
Any connection between the campaign against the coup and keeping a cinema seat? Analyzes the Asia Sentinel: Chotisak “is willing to become a martyr for something he believes in, even if it means going to jail for not standing up in a movie theater.”
Chotisak insists: “To not rise is not an offense against anyone” – noting that the Thai constitution’s Articles 4 and 28 guarantee citizens the right to make a choice according to ones beliefs and faith.
Chotisak called for Article 112 of the Criminal Code to be revoked. He said it imposes restrictions on the freedom of the people and had often been used against people with different political ideals. The lèse majesté law tends to be open to an overly broad interpretation.
Possibly read as: Tend to be open to an overly broad politicization.
Makes you remember the legendary birthday speech of HM the King on December 5th, 2005, when His Majesty himself appeared to question Thailand’s not too modern laws that deter most Thais from even discussing the monarchy.
In his speech he refuted the long-accepted tradition of constitutional monarchy that the king can do no wrong. “If the King can do no wrong,” he said, “it is akin to looking down upon him because the King is not being treated as a human being. But the King can do wrong.”
His Majesty the King welcomed criticism – if it helps to keep the monarchy informed and helps to correct any mistakes. “If you say that the King cannot be criticized, it suggests that the King is not human,” His Majesty said.
“If someone offers criticisms suggesting that the King is wrong, then I would like to be informed of their opinion. If I am not, that could be problematic … If we hold that the King cannot be criticized or violated, then the King ends up in a difficult situation.”
He said no Thai king had ever imprisoned people for such violations. Even King Rama VI (King Vajiravudh) did not punish anyone for rebelling against him. His Majesty added that during his reign, he has never allowed anybody accused of violating him to go to prison.
“If they get sent to prison, I pardon them. If they don’t go to prison, I won’t sue them, because those who violate the King and are punished are not the ones who are in trouble. It would be the King who was in trouble. It is strange, but the lawyers like to send people to prison (for allegedly violating the King).”
A day before this cinema case Thai minister Jakrapob Penkiair had Lese Majeste charges files against him for a media event at the FCCT, although Jakrapob was very rude towards the Thai monarchy the media downplayed it. He is also guilty of insulting Queen Elizabeth II. The host of this anarchy was the BBC’s Jonathan Head who has also been charged with Lese Majeste.
Strange how the media finds this tiny case more important …
Glad to have finally found someone who was there at the FCCT. Neither Bangkok Pundit nor New Mandala could shed light on this … So Jonathan basically was charged for not being in control of the event?
BangkokDan
The time of the great IFs approaches.
The internet makes detective work easy, a quick look at the BBC website and videos on YouTube and you know that something is going on. Careful reading reveals that Jonathan was a bit of a rogue LM merchant.
I think the more recent Chotisak case and Thaksin the Flag stories are an attempt to misuse the Lese Majeste law.
Strange that the Democrats and Thailand’s Special Branch ignore this evil plot and pursue stupid unknown photocopy rubbish! Although Thaksin still has power in Thailand it will be interesting to see how he escapes this time – can money still talk to the police? I think not!
Will these guys go up to court or up in a plane? Now that is the real question!
(BD: This comment had to be edited. Please mind the delicate issue, otherwise comments for this topic will be closed.)
Yeah why don’t you go and look for FCCT-related videos on YouTube? There are quite a few and you could get some idea about what was going on there.
(BD: You left me no choice, had to edit/delete rest of the entry.)
[...] how often did HM say that he will pardon anyone convicted of lèse [...]
[...] charges against Chotisak when the latter refused to move. Chotisak faces 3-15 years in prison. Lèse Majesté Charges For Keeping Cinema Seat A Thai woman arrested for refusing to stand as the royal anthem played in a Bangkok cinema faces [...]